Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) was first described by Fernström and Johansson in 1976 in a prone position. Since then, this surgical approach has become the gold standard for treatment of large stones and it has evolved over time resulting in decrease in invasiveness and morbidity and improvements in ergonomics and outcomes.
PCNL is a procedure designed to remove large or complex kidney stones while the patient lies on their back (supine position). This approach allows for direct access to the kidney through a small incision in the back, utilizing a nephroscope and specialized instruments to locate and extract the stones. The technique is particularly advantageous for patients with larger stones or those who have not responded to other treatments such as medication or lithotripsy
The position offers several benefits compared to the traditional prone approach:
Embark on a journey of exceptional healthcare guided by industry's true luminaries who consistently exceed
expectations and set new benchmarks for excellence in everything from cutting-edge innovations to personalized care.
While PCNL and supine PCNL offers numerous advantages, its successful implementation depends on surgeon training, adaptation to procedural differences, and collaboration with anesthesiologists. For novice surgeons, it provides a gentler learning curve with ergonomic benefits that enhance surgical performance. With highly skilled teams like those at MASSH Hospital leading the way, PCNL and supine PCNL is poised to become a standard practice in urology.
MASSH Group of Hospitals is a trusted name in delivering advanced healthcare solutions with a network of premier super speciality hospitals, committed to providing ethical, compassionate, and innovative care. Our expanding network ensures that cutting-edge medical services are always within your reach.
Supine PCNL is a minimally invasive procedure to remove large kidney stones while the patient lies on their back (supine position), unlike traditional PCNL where the patient lies face down (prone). This position improves patient comfort, anesthesia access, and surgical efficiency.
It is ideal for patients with large (>2 cm), complex, or multiple kidney stones, especially those who cannot tolerate the prone position due to obesity, lung issues, or spine problems.
Yes, for many patients PCNL reduces the risk of breathing and circulation problems during anesthesia and allows better communication between surgical and anesthesia teams during the procedure.
The supine position enhances patient safety, allows simultaneous access to the ureter if needed, and often leads to shorter operative times and quicker recovery.
A small incision is made in the flank or side, and a tract is created to access the kidney. A nephroscope is then used to visualize and break the stones using ultrasonic or laser energy, and fragments are removed.
Yes, because the incision is smaller and muscle disruption is minimal. Most patients report less postoperative pain and a faster return to normal activities.
Patients usually stay in the hospital for 1–2 days and can resume most normal activities within a week, depending on overall health and stone burden.
As with any surgery, risks include bleeding, infection, or injury to the kidney or surrounding organs. However, supine PCNL is considered safe and well-tolerated with fewer complications in many cases.
In some cases, a temporary stent or nephrostomy tube may be placed to aid healing and urine drainage. Your doctor will remove it once the kidney has recovered.
MASSH provides state-of-the-art endourology facilities with expert urologists skilled in advanced PCNL techniques, supported by modern technology and a multidisciplinary care approach. With comprehensive aftercare and experienced surgeons, MASSH ensures safe, effective, and successful outcomes for kidney stone patients.
In Standard PCNL, the patient lies in a prone (face-down) position, while in Supine PCNL, the patient lies on their back. Supine PCNL offers easier airway access for anesthesia and simultaneous retrograde procedures. Both techniques are effective, but the choice depends on patient condition and surgeon preference.